Automated interpretation of comparison scores for firearm toolmarks on cartridge case primers.

An automated approach for evaluating the strength of the evidence of firearm toolmark comparison results is presented for a common source scenario. First, comparison scores are derived describing the similarity of marks typically encountered on the primer of fired cartridge cases: aperture shear striations as well as breechface and firing pin impressions. Subsequently, these scores are interpreted using reference distributions of comparison scores obtained for representative known matching (KM) and known non-matching (KNM) ballistic samples in a common source, score-based likelihood ratio (LR) system. We study various alternatives to set up such an LR system and compare them using qualitative and quantitative criteria known from the literature. As an example, results are applied to establish a system suitable for a firearm-ammunition combination often encountered in casework: Glock firearms with Fiocchi nickel primer ammunition. The system outputs an LR and a measure of LR uncertainty. The range of possible LR-values is limited to a minimum and maximum value in areas of the score domain with little reference data. Finally, the feasibility of combining LRs of different mark types into one LR for the entire primer is assessed. For the distribution models considered in this paper, different modeling approaches are optimal for different types of similarity scores. For the chosen firearm-ammunition combination, non-parametric Kernel Density Estimation (KDE) models perform best for similarity scores based on the correlation coefficient, whereas parametric models perform best for the Congruent Matching Cells (CMC) scores, assuming binomial and beta-binomial models for KM and KNM score distributions respectively. Finally, it is demonstrated that individual LRs of different mark types can be combined into one LR, to interpret a set of different marks on the primer as a whole.

The influence of storage conditions on fingermarks developed with 1,2-indanedione-ZnCl.

The most important class of reagents for the enhancement of fingermarks on porous surfaces are those that react with the amino acid constituents of fingermarks. Ninhydrin, DFO (1,8-diazafluoren-9-one), and 1,2-indanedione are the three most common techniques widely known in forensic laboratories for the visualization of latent fingermarks on porous surfaces. In 2012 the Netherlands Forensic Institute replaced DFO by 1,2-indanedione-ZnCl after an internal validation, just like an increasing numbers of laboratories. In 2003, Gardner et al. published an article showing that fingermarks treated with 1,2-indanedione (without ZnCl), that were stored in daylight only decreased by 20% in fluorescence in 28 days. However, during casework we observed that the fluorescence of fingermarks treated with 1,2-indanedione with ZnCl decreased more rapidly. In this study, the effect of various storage conditions and aging times on the fluorescence of marks after treatment with 1,2-indanedione-ZnCl were assessed. Latent printed fingermarks from the digital matrix printer (DMP) and natural fingermarks from a known donor were used. The results showed that storing fingermarks in daylight (wrapped and un-wrapped) drastically decrease (over 60% loss) in fluorescence in approximately three weeks. Storage of the marks in a dark environment (at room temperature, in the refrigerator or even in the freezer) resulted in a decrease in fluorescence of less than 40%. Our recommendation is to always store treated fingermarks with 1,2-indanedione-ZnCl in a dark environment and, if possible, photographing them directly (within 1-2 days after treatment) to minimize the decrease of fluorescence.

Variability and specificity of bone cutting mark properties in cases involving stabbing with knives.

Sharp force traumas are frequently encountered in stabbing crime victims. During an examination, the properties of cutting marks in bones are compared with the properties of suspect tools, particularly knives. Therefore, the variation and specificity of knife and cutting mark properties must be known. This article provides the variability and specificity of a set of knife blade and cutting mark properties. Plain and serrated knives are used to create experimental cutting marks in porcine ribs, knife properties are derived from surface acquisitions of the blades and mark properties from Micro-CT data. We consider two conditions, automated stabbing using a motorized stage and manual stabbing. In addition, we study the influence of maceration on marks. For knives, the blade edge angle, blade thickness, and bevel height, and for cutting marks, the shape, the wall angle, the width, and the bevel height are determined and compared. The results show that the relationship between corresponding properties of blades and marks depends on the knife type. For plain knives, the width and wall angle of the marks are dependent on the mark depth and are significantly smaller than the blade properties edge angle and width. For serrated knives, this is not the case. The mark shape only provides slight support for a knife type for marks deeper than the blade bevel height. In conclusion, mark properties are only specific for a particular knife brand and model if the blade properties differ significantly and assuming a specific knife type.

Interpol review of shoe and tool marks 2016-2019.

This review paper covers the forensic-relevant literature in shoe and tool mark examination from 2016 to 2019 as a part of the 19th Interpol International Forensic Science Managers Symposium. The review papers are also available at the Interpol website at: https://www.interpol.int/content/download/14458/file/Interpol%20Review%20Papers%202019.pdf.